Search for: "People v Ervin"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2013, 12:21 pm
Supreme Court case Laird v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 1:50 pm
It's very hard for me to figure out why Ervine gets picked out to die unless every cop killer gets the same sentence. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
In People v. iMergent, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jan. 20, 2009), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Six) upheld a preliminary injunction prohibiting the defendants from violating the UCL and the Seller Assisted Marketing Plan ("SAMP") Act (Civ. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
(People v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:30 am
And being an Ervin, surrounded by a lot of very high-achieving, very academically oriented Black people, has been really motivating to me. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
(People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:13 am
From Judge James Peterson's decision Friday in Ervins v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 6:27 am
More than one-third of the 215 people exonerated by DNA evidence were between the ages of 14 and 22 when they were arrested. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:40 am
Are those 7 million people who need to find other doctors finding better doctors? [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 6:09 am
Wong-Ervin & Joshua D. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 4:22 am
The evidence presented at the suppression hearing establishes that defendant was in custody in the police vehicle when the arresting officer asked him questions about his life and his church (see People v Paulman, 5 NY3d 122, 129; People v Yukl, 25 NY2d 585, 589, cert denied 400 US 851),and the People failed to establish that the arresting officer's questions did not constitute interrogation or its functional equivalent (see Rhode Island v… [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 1:01 am
observing: Forty-five years after Brown v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:48 am
Estate of Duff There are a lot more people involved, but I will break this down. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 10:13 am
From Cohen v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 5:03 pm
Gosh, people behave like this? [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm
, where the answer is basically because over 200 years of systematic opposition to the idiocy of that system has proved unavailing against the barriers of Article V, most dramatically in 1969, where the Senate, because of a filibuster led by white supremacists Southern senators Sam Ervin and Strom Thurmond, never voted on a proposal that had in fact gained the assent of two-thirds of the House of Representatives and perhaps would have gotten the two thirds had the Senate been… [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 6:20 am
(People v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 2:54 pm
Supreme Court said it in Stern v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 2:54 pm
Supreme Court said it in Stern v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 7:18 am
Alvarez & Seff v. [read post]
