Search for: "People v Farewell" Results 1 - 20 of 85
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2023, 8:04 am by Tom Goldstein and Amy Howe
The post Hail and farewell appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
The post Farewell to the Mayflower appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 8:48 am by Donald Clarke
(Law on Legislation, Art. 8(v); that's one reason why re-education through labor, with its flimsy statutory basis, has been under attack.) [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 5:49 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Lee CarterOn October 15, 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada will hear oral arguments in the case of Lee Carter, et al. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:34 am
I Passing off the National Guild of Removers and Storers I Fuss over function: In case you missed the annual IP-World Christmas party I The Supreme People's Court of China's Michael Jordan Trademark Decision I Intermediary IP injunctions: what are the EU implications of the UK experience? [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 8:20 pm by Ron Coleman
” Stop the presses and raise a glass in belated farewell toast to Archie Bunker’s generic beer! [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:53 pm by Hannah Kiddoo
Tatum gave her farewell remarks before Trey Apffel, a League City attorney, was sworn in as the 2014-2015 State Bar president. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Walter Olson
Related, CPSC finally holds public hearing on magnet sets standard [WLF Legal Pulse] SCOTUS sleeper Bond v. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 11:49 am
| Passing off the National Guild of Removers and Storers | Fuss over function: In case you missed the annual IP-World Christmas party | The Supreme People's Court of China's Michael Jordan Trademark Decision | Intermediary IP injunctions: what are the EU implications of the UK experience? [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:01 am
"* The Supreme People's Court of China's Michael Jordan Trademark DecisionFormer GuestKat Mike Mireles and Kat friend Henry Liao dicuss the fresh court decision (from the Supreme People’s Court of China) on the Michael Jordan trade mark/name-personality case. [read post]