Search for: "People v Ferro"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2007, 5:21 am
The IPKat says, watch out for Case C-108/07 Ferrero Deutschland v OHIM and Cornu - but don't hold your breath: it can take the best part of two years to get a result.Left: Ferro-actinolite. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 4:43 am
I belatedly found Shane Ferro's take, via the Art Law Blog. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 5:48 pm
People v Ferro, 63 NY2d 316, 321 [1984], cert denied 472 US 1007 [1985]). [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 9:14 am
Cash indisputably plays a significant role as circumstantial evidence in narcotics cases (citations omitted), however, and we conclude that 'an objective observer with the same knowledge concerning the suspect as the police had would conclude that the [question of the narcotics officer concerning the ownership of cash found in the kitchen during the execution of the search warrant] was reasonably likely to elicit [an incriminating] response' (People v Ferro, 63… [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:41 pm
Ferro and the case of People v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:02 pm
Ferro and the case of People v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 4:10 am
In California, a recent Workers' Compensation Appeals Board panel opinion imposed the maximum statutory penalty against a carrier for what it said was an unreasonable delay in the approval of psychotropic medications for an injured worker.In Ferro v. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 4:22 am
The evidence presented at the suppression hearing establishes that defendant was in custody in the police vehicle when the arresting officer asked him questions about his life and his church (see People v Paulman, 5 NY3d 122, 129; People v Yukl, 25 NY2d 585, 589, cert denied 400 US 851),and the People failed to establish that the arresting officer's questions did not constitute interrogation or its functional equivalent (see Rhode Island v… [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 7:42 am
Ferro, Esquire, entered his appearance on May 22, 2014. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 6:15 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 7:00 am
On Long Island, the case of Singer v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
Since President Biden issued his July 2021 Executive Order on Competition, the antitrust agencies have made broad policy statements promising more aggressive enforcement and have initiated a number of high-profile enforcement actions. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 12:56 pm
” Paramount Communications Inc. v. [read post]
