Search for: "People v Folk"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2014, 8:35 am
In a bow to its market, the folks at Stata continue to tinker with Excel interfaces. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 9:00 am
First, a limerick:There once was a couple who owed rent.They were so much in debt they were bent;Their folks they did get,To lend every cent,And now they all live in a tent.The other day, I was visited by a older couple. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 5:16 am
They are sometimes called the Sith, or the Good People, or the invisible folk. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 5:45 am
> * People are salty that Ketanji Brown Jackson thinks Roe v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 10:22 am
the Whites fraudulently enrolled people in ACA plans in states where those people did not live. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:35 pm
It seems that the people at Porsche -- yes, the luxury sports car maker -- have sued the footwear folks. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 11:15 am
But I guess these folks had a theory. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 2:28 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:04 pm
Bradley v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 2:50 pm
How many of those folks would you hand a trial transcript over to before saying, "OK. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 1:04 pm
Torts folks might be interested in a recent paper by Griffin Sims Edwards (Emory, Econ), Doing Their Duty: An Empirical Analysis of the Unintended Effect of Tarasoff v Regents on Homicidal Activity. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
Since every judge has a sexual orientation, every judge has a potential bias when faced with a case about discrimination against gay people or straight people. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
It simply seems like it's rebutted in situations in which, as here, everyone agrees that the impropriety resulted in (1) an acquittal on an offense that lots of jurors thought the guy was guilty of, and (2) a conviction in which all the jurors already thought the guy was guilty (and a portion of whom were merely hoping to convict on a greater offense).The case that Justice Robie cites for prejudice in this context is People v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 11:26 am
Some folks may wonder, “Don’t diabetics already run an increased risk of amputation? [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Consider the case of King v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 8:25 pm
First, let me thank the folks at the Conglomerate for inviting me to guest blog. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 2:58 pm
Which is why even trained lawyers like the prosecutor and defense counsel disagree on what it says.But the trial judge simply reads the instruction to the jurors and lets these legally untrained folk figure out for themselves what even two lawyers and a judge couldn't resolve.At which point the Court of Appeal typically says: "Well, we presume the jury followed the properly given instructions. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:22 pm
We ordinary folk sometimes have to delve into it as well. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 3:52 pm
If I recall from the history books, for example, Joseph Smith was just a farmer who thought he had a vision and found some plates while digging for treasure, so he and a bunch of other folks started worshiping in their own special way. [read post]
