Search for: "People v G-R." Results 81 - 100 of 824
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2007, 12:27 am
Dumanski WESTCHESTER COUNTYCriminal Practice Gas Station Violated GBL §396-r, Executive Law §63 Enjoined From Capitalizing on Market Disruptions People v. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
Elérí Ípin, Ìbikeji Olódumarè, A-je-jù-Oògùn, Obìriti, A-p'ijó-ikú-da, Olúwa mi, A-to-i-ba-j'ayé, Òrò à-bi-kú-j'igbo, Olúwa mi, Ajiki, Ógégé a-gb'ayé-gún; Odúdú ti nídú orí emèrè;… [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Ontario (Disability Support Program) v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am by Matthew Flinn
This was a matter which had divided the House of Lords, and consequently been left open, in R v G (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) [2008] UKHL 37, in which a decision to prosecute a 15 year old for sexual intercourse with a 12 year old was challenged. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 10:12 am by Giles Peaker
R v Unah [2011] EWCA Crim 1837 [2012] 1 WLR 505 and R v Y(A) [2010] EWCA Crim 762 [2010] 1 WLR 2644The Magistrates did not appear to have approached the question of whether there was a reasonable basis for Ms G’s belief:They do not set out the facts which say what the reasonable basis for that belief was and there were a number of factors which they would have required to address, including the structure of the Tribunal’s decision, flat by… [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 10:12 am by Giles Peaker
R v Unah [2011] EWCA Crim 1837 [2012] 1 WLR 505 and R v Y(A) [2010] EWCA Crim 762 [2010] 1 WLR 2644The Magistrates did not appear to have approached the question of whether there was a reasonable basis for Ms G’s belief:They do not set out the facts which say what the reasonable basis for that belief was and there were a number of factors which they would have required to address, including the structure of the Tribunal’s decision, flat by… [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
G, 2020 SCC 38 (CanLII) [1] People with mental illnesses face persistent stigma and prejudicial treatment in Canadian society, which has imposed profound and widespread social, political, and legal disadvantage on them. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
R v Acera, 2017 ABQB 470 [10] One understands, intellectually, all of these principles, none of which are new. [read post]