Search for: "People v Gang"
Results 1 - 20
of 994
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2018, 12:48 pm
Now in the recent case of People v Perez, decided December 18, 2017 the Court of Appeal reversed a conviction for a gang crime in a case where there just wasn’t any evidence to support the testimony that it was done for the benefit of the gang. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 7:16 am
The case, People v. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 2:47 pm
People v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:49 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 6:39 pm
(People v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm
Critics fear the Tories will now move to cripple Ofcom — and then quietly relax the restrictions on Sky News … THE PRESS GANG campaign — The People v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:48 pm
Now in the recent case of People v Perez, decided December 18, 2017 the Court of Appeal reversed a conviction for a gang crime in a case where there just wasn’t any evidence to support the testimony that it was done for the benefit of the gang. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 2:16 pm
They try to make sure they're not "dropouts" from the gang -- people who left the gang, since that means they'll be attacked if they're housed with members of the gang. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 5:44 am
For example, in Sepulveda v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:04 am
I realize I never posted anything about the California Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in People v. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
[Post by Venkat] People v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 11:19 am
Oh, the people who had assaulted X were M's cousins.X isn't happy about that. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 1:44 pm
People v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 1:29 pm
So presumably that attorney would be subject to a gang enhancement too? [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:00 am
–Andrew V. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 1:09 pm
I often don't quite understand these gang shooting cases. [read post]
28 May 2023, 1:28 pm
People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:38 am
When you spontaneously decide to do a drive-by shooting, you might want to make sure that the group of eight people who you think look like opposing gang members really are who you think they are. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:28 am
The Court holds that "(1) prejudice against people associated with gangs represented a pervasive bias relevant to a key dynamic likely to arise at trial, and (2) the district court neglected to 'inquire about, or warn against,' that bias. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:25 pm
On Wednesday, I was critical of a particular gang shooting. [read post]
