Search for: "People v Garcia (Andrew)" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm by Donald Thompson
 Not every gunshot ineluctably results in serious physical injury (see, People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771 [3rd Dept 2006] [victim shot with shotgun from 20 feet away, evidence insufficient to establish serious physical injury]; see also, People v Rojas, 61 NY2d 726 [1984] [gunshot injury does not by itself establish substantial pain as required for physical injury]; People v Francis, 112 AD2d 167 [2nd Dept 1985] [same]; People v… [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 10:46 am
For the Paisanos on that date, Villafana was the shot caller, Salvador Garcia (Chava) was the right-hand man, and Guillen was the mouse. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Garcia, 905 F.2d 557, 559 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 986, 111 S.Ct. 522, 112 L.Ed.2d 533 (1990); United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
 The jury were unable to agree on two charges (against Andrew Coulson and Clive Goodman). [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 1:11 am
Louie Garcia NEW YORK COUNTYFamily LawMotion to Close Courtroom for Hearing To Vacate Child's Adoption Is Denied Matter of Doe KINGS COUNTYCriminal PracticeStrangulation Is Uncommon Brutality; Depraved Indifference Charge Stands People v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:05 am by Amy Howe
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Chicago school people would disagree b/c the choice to become informed is itself a cost that people choose to bear or not bear.) [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am by INFORRM
On 21 July 2014, a nine day libel trial in the case of Garcia v Associated Newspapers will begin before Dingemans J. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
£10,000 (a) Garcia v Associated Newspapers Limited, £45,000 (c)  Appleyard v Wilby, £60,000 (b) Asghar v Nawaijang, £270,000 (3) The following letter appeared in The Times following the judgment in the Andrew Mitchell libel trial. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:48 am by Peter Mahler
The defendant brother opposed the requested injunction, as summarized by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrew Borrok in his decision granting the injunction, on the ground that defendant “merely transferred his stock or membership interests and that he somehow retained interests in the company’s good will. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
” Inforrm had an article on the new phenomenon of the “TikTok Tabloid,” which sets out how digital technologies are enabling a new form of social surveillance, and the impact this has on people’s private lives. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Andrews, No. 06-30068 Denial of pro se petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus as not timely filed is reversed and remanded where: 1) the state did not demonstrate that petitioner should have learned of the existence and relevance of the victim's former employer's testimony with the exercise of due diligence at his trial; and 2) also, a magistrate judge erred in her calculation of the one-year limitations period under the AEDPA. [read post]