Search for: "People v Grainger"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2009, 2:12 am
Grainger plc v Nicholson UKEAT/219/09; [2009] WLR (D) 315 “An asserted philosophical belief that mankind was heading towards catastrophic climate change and therefore people were under a moral duty to lead their lives in a manner which mitigated or avoided that catastrophe for the benefit of future generations, and to persuade others to do the same, [...] [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 1:47 pm
People v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 12:13 am
The arguments In Forstater v CGD Europe & Ors [2021] UKEAT 0105 20 1006, the EAT had declared at [79] that: “in applying Grainger V, tribunals [should] bear in mind that it is only those beliefs that would be an affront to Convention principles in a manner akin to that of pursuing totalitarianism, or advocating Nazism, or espousing violence and hatred of the gravest of forms, that should be capable of being not worthy of respect in a democratic society. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 2:45 am
The school argued that her beliefs under (a) and (b) did not meet the test for protection under s.10 Equality Act 2010 as laid down in Grainger plc v Nicholson [2010] ICR 360 EAT. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 5:01 am
A recent case, Grainger v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:52 am
Background In Dr David Miller v University of Bristol [2024] ET 1400780/2022, the claimant was appointed Professor of Political Sociology at the University from 1 September 2018. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 11:27 pm
All the wrong people will celebrate. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 11:15 pm
At a preliminary hearing to determine whether her belief was protected by s.10 Equality Act 2010, the initial Employment Tribunal held that her belief was “not worthy of respect in a democratic society” and, therefore, failed the fifth criterion established in Grainger plc v Nicholson [2009] UKEAT 0219 09 0311. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 11:58 pm
Race, feminism and the Grainger criteria At a preliminary hearing in Mr S Corby v Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service [2023] ET 1805305/2022, Mr Corby claimed that he held philosophical beliefs that challenged critical theory in general and a belief in the importance of character over race. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 2:57 am
Case-notes DLA Piper has just published a series of notes on leading cases on religion/belief and employment law: Bailey v Stonewall Equality Ltd and Garden Court Chambers (2020) Fahmy v Arts Council England (2023) Furlong v The Chief Constable of Cheshire Police (2019) Grainger Plc and others v Nicholson (2010) Higgs v Farmor’s School (2023) Joanna Phoenix v Open University (2024) Ladele v London Borough of Islington… [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
Tesla's Original eBookMost likely, the court will ask whether the distribution of books in digital form were recognized by knowledgeable people in the publishing industry in 1972. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
Tesla's Original eBookMost likely, the court will ask whether the distribution of books in digital form were recognized by knowledgeable people in the publishing industry in 1972. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
Tesla's Original eBookMost likely, the court will ask whether the distribution of books in digital form were recognized by knowledgeable people in the publishing industry in 1972. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 3:48 pm
See Grainger v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 4:51 am
[v] See, e.g., People v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am
Quick links Employment Writes: Grainger v The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster: “Is it right that that person should be deprived of a remedy because their non-theism is wrapped up in a cloak of spaghetti? [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:59 am
The list of potentially protectable beliefs under the Religion and Philosophy part of the Equality Act was added to, with belief in “Green issues” established last year by Grainger PLC v Nicholson, being joined by a belief in the ethos of the Joe Hashman BBC, and being fervently opposed to fox hunting (Hashman v Orchard Park Garden Centre). [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 5:47 am
There could be no action under the Equalities Act 2010 since, although ‘belief’ is a protected characteristic, discrimination against an objectionable political belief does not count (see Grainger Plc v Nicholson [2010] ICR 360, [28]). [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 1:05 am
: off-topic, but an interesting take on Grainger v Nicholson. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:11 pm
Dunkin’ Donuts IHOP Bridgestone DuPont IKEA Buffalo Wild Wings Duracell ln-N-Out Burger Campbell’s Soup Eddie V’s International Paper Carl’s Jr. [read post]
