Search for: "People v Grajales"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2007, 3:14 pm
The New York Court of Appeals considered that question in People v Grajales, 2007 NY Slip Op 01385, a case where 710.30 notice had been timely served relative to an identification of a robbery... [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:35 pm
The Court of Appeals held in People v Grajales (8 NY3d 861 [2007]) that the People are not required to give 710.30 notice of identifications of the defendant made during a photo identification procedure, such as an array The Court reasoned that because testimony regarding photographic identification procedures is not admissible, the People cannot "intend to offer at trial" such testimony. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
If so, you might consider the following from People v Nolasco, 70 AD3d 972 [2nd Dept 2010]:Contrary to the People’s contention, the Court of Appeals’ decision in People v Grajales, 8 NY3d 861, does not excuse their failure to provide such notice. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 5:01 pm
See People v. [read post]
