Search for: "People v Griggs"
Results 1 - 20
of 58
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2009, 9:41 pm
Griggs v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 3:21 pm
At the heart of the Ricci case was the doctrine of disparate-impact discrimination, which the Supreme Court first articulated in its 1971 decision in Griggs v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 12:30 am
In it he discusses Robert Belton's The Crusade for Equality in the Workplace: The Griggs v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 9:25 am
Berman, Marsha Griggs, and Carol Chomsky. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
The Crusade for Equality in the Workplace: The Griggs v. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 1:31 pm
The term “disparate impact” was first used in the 1971 Supreme Court case Griggs v. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 3:26 am
But the issue in the case was whether the disparate impact analysis from Title VII, approved in Griggs v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:03 pm
Griggs v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:03 pm
Griggs v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 3:52 am
Kleber urges a different conclusion in no small part on the basis of the Supreme Court’s 1971 decision in Griggs v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 9:38 am
City of Jackson and Griggs v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 7:08 am
It also “tracks” with the Supreme Court’s reading, in Griggs v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:48 pm
Source: https://www.americanbar.org/groups/young_lawyers/publications/the_101_201_practice_series/disparate_impact_unintentional_discrimination/ https://legaldictionary.net/griggs-v-duke-power-co/ https://newsone.com/3780050/racial-discrimination-shaving-facial-hair-razor-bumps-dreadlocks-african-americans/ https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2016-05-09Read More [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:24 am
Justice Ginsburg writes: In arriving at its order, the Court barely acknowledges the pathmarking decision in Griggs v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 6:05 am
By: Colleen V. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:38 pm
This is an historic ruling, up there with some of the other SCOTUS decisions like Brown, Griggs v Duke Power on testing and educational requirements, and same-sex marriage. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 9:57 am
That would be Ricci v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 4:34 pm
The policy of the 1985 Act was to protect people against excessive and unreasonable service charge demands. [read post]
1 May 2010, 4:34 pm
The policy of the 1985 Act was to protect people against excessive and unreasonable service charge demands. [read post]
