Search for: "People v Halo" Results 21 - 40 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
Next we enter the exciting world of patent law with Halo Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 am by Amy Howe
” At Patently-O, Dennis Crouch analyzes the Court’s decision in Halo Electronics v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 2:54 pm by Kali Borkoski
With this in mind, today in our discussion of FCC v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm
Here to lead readers through the case is solicitor and long-time Katfriend Richard Kempner, who explains as follows:In Fresh v Deepend the courts found in favour of Fresh (the people behind the Innocent smoothie brand), in its hotly-contested action as to who owns the copyright in the ‘Dude’ (the stylised face with halo, right), the logo used by Innocent for the past 15 years on all its smoothie bottles. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am by John Elwood
Halo Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 6:30 am by Drew Boortz
  This strategy is in place to benefit the company's hardware sales because having exclusive titles can work out well for platforms (I know a few people who bought an Xbox 360 because they wanted to Halo). [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 8:36 am by Anna Lvovsky
Beginning even before the Supreme Court’s 1966 ruling in Miranda v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:57 pm
Alongside those templated sounds of Bob and Neil and Joni and Jerry within, I suppose I also came to project a bit of a political halo onto the people that used to be called "draft dodgers. [read post]
25 May 2013, 10:16 am by Rick Hills
My example of a point in the black circle of "preemption" is Judge Silberman's use of Machinist preemption to eliminate President Clinton's executive order on replacement of striking workers in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]