Search for: "People v Harrington" Results 81 - 100 of 146
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
James Cannell argued that under the test established in Boumediene v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Renee Hobbs, Professor and Founding Director of the Harrington School of Communication and Media, University of Rhode Island. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:15 pm by Jeff Gamso
  That's so last century.This year, in Harrington v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 10:36 pm by Stephen Page
If it was not, in the circumstances it couldonly, and impermissibly,have been based upon his Honour’s own views aboutthose matters.Family ViolenceThe Full Court stated, quoting the trial judge: Itis my assessment, after reading all the relevant police material in evidence,the affidavit evidence and seeing and hearing boththe mother and father givingoral evidence, that the mother is not, and has never been, fearful of the fatherbut that she has abusedthe system in place to protect… [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:22 am by Aaron Pelley
Byrd: The Court overruled its recent decision in State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:14 am by GuestPost
This latter version, and particularly Rousseau, prioritises the notion of the “general will” of the people. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:23 pm by royblack
This week in Ashcroft v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
Health lawK3260.3 .G58 2010Global health and human rights : legal and philosophical perspectives / edited by John Harrington and Maria Stuttaford.London New York : Routledge, 2010. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 12:48 pm by Stephen Page
The communication and interaction between [the child] and his mother displayed a strong and secure attachment as well as a familiarity in playful and fun activities together.Later [the mother]’s partner, [Mr V] entered the room and [the child] engaged easily in play with him and the communication appeared relaxed and familiar.In relation to his mother, the child told the family consultant he liked “walking and dancing and watching TV with mum and I have heaps of toys. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm by Stephen Page
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 7:53 pm by Stephen Page
This court deals with people in extremis, and history tells Judges horrifying tales that sick and/or evil parents can do sick and evil things to their children. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:19 am by James Bickford
In reversing that decision, the Court quoted at length from Harrington v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
  The Supreme Court did engage in its favorite contact sport — beating up on the 9th Circuit — unanimously reversing the latter court’s grant of habeas in two cases, Harrington v. [read post]