Search for: "People v Henriques"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm
Background In March 2012, Mr Khuja was one of a number of people arrested on suspicion of committing sexual offences against children in the Oxford area. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 5:03 pm
After a number of such cases Henriques J urged the professions to take action. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:36 pm
(Rafael Henrique | Dreamstime.com)On Monday, the Supreme Court held oral argument in Murthy v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 4:06 pm
The long-awaited judgment in Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers Limited is the right decision. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
This has been the subject of recent case law (including ERY v Associated Newspapers [2016] EWHC 2760 (QB) and ZXC v Bloomberg [2017] EWHC 328 (QB)) and non-judicial consideration (e.g., the Henriques Review and the College of Policing Guidance on Relationships with the Media). [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Ward v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 1:37 pm
(Rafael Henrique | Dreamstime.com)Today, the Supreme Court decided to hear Moody v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:06 am
“Expect a shock,” said Michael V. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:57 pm
(Rafael Henrique | Dreamstime.com)On Friday, in Missouri v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:43 am
On October 14, 2011, Picard filed a lawsuit (Picard v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am
A French state watchdog has called for the suspension of a database that could end up holding the biometric details of 60 million people. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 9:03 am
Cariou v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 2:24 pm
(Rafael Henrique | Dreamstime.com) One of the main arguments advanced to justify the Florida and Texas social media laws challenged in NetChoice v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 5:39 pm
A very weak one was advanced before Henriques J, which he rejected. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:12 pm
(Rafael Henrique | Dreamstime.com)Columbia law Prof. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
Shiv Sidharth v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
