Search for: "People v Hollman"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2013, 10:45 am
Pursuant to People v DeBour (40 NY2d 210) and People v Hollman (79 NY2d 181), an analysis of the lawfulness of police action for purposes of determining a suppression motion requires the court to engage in the legal equivalent of the filming of a stop action animation. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:09 am
People v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 12:02 pm
In Fulton v. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 1:10 pm
People v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 7:47 am
Two decisions -- People v Battaglia (56 NY2d 558 [1982], reversing on dissent of Hancock, Jr., J. at 82 AD2d 389) and People v Hicks (68 NY2d 234 [1986]) - - have appeared to be in conflict. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 5:38 pm
In People v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:36 pm
Based on People v Holmes and People v Hollman, police pursuit of an individual significantly impedes the person's freedom of movement and thus must be justified by reasonable suspicion that a crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:54 am
See, e.g., EEOC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:12 am
People v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:25 pm
People v. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 3:49 pm
It was held in the cases of People v De Bour and People v Hollman that a police officer is permitted to question any citizen provided that the officer has an articulable reason for the inquiry. [read post]
