Search for: "People v Huntley" Results 1 - 20 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2015, 11:47 am by Stephen Bilkis
Page 1 2009 NY Slip Op 51445(U) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 2:43 pm by Bystander
So a young person who, say, steals a bike in a moment of drunken idiocy might find that conviction for theft emerging 25 years later when he is applying for a senior post in a sensitive area.Without Huntley, it's perfectly possible that none of this would have happened.The other case that comes to mind is R v Witchelo (1992) 13 Cr.App.R.S. 371. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 4:00 pm by James Eckert
In my opinion, and here's the shiny object in the weeds that I wanted to get to, the People have a burden under People v Huntley (15 NY2d 72 [1965]) to establish that the statement is voluntary before it can be admitted:"the jury passes on voluntariness only after the judge has fully and independently resolved the issue against the accused’ and has made express findings upon the disputed fact question of voluntariness. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:19 pm by James Eckert
In People v McClean, decided June 10th, the Court of Appeals held that, while right to counsel deprivations are normally reviewable even in the absence of an objection, the record must be clear that there was a deprivation, so a form of preservation requirement sneaks in through the back door. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:36 pm by NARF
City of San Antonio (Temporary Restraining Order; Religious Freedom) Huntley and Jackson, et al. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 12:14 pm by Stephen Bilkis
First, as the defendant has argued, there is the position articulated in People v Stridiron, 175 Misc 2d 16 (Criminal Ct Queens County 1997), where the court established a four-part test for determining whether a Domestic Incident converts a complaint to an information.1 The first Page 3 prong of the Stridiron test, which is what is at issue in the instant case, is that the factual allegations of a Domestic Incident Report "must contain every element of the factual allegations… [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
On the consent of the People and pursuant to People v Dunaway, Mapp v Ohio and People v Huntley, a hearing was held in this matter on 19 October 2012. [read post]
25 May 2014, 11:08 am
People v Perkins ruled that PL §§ 265.01(1) and 400.00 are constitutional and do not run afoul of Heller. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:52 pm
Suppression, pursuant to CPL 710.20 (3), of the defendant's alleged statements or, in the alternative, a Huntley hearing. 6. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 1:41 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKConsumer Protection Class Not Certified in FDCPA Lawsuit; No Evidence Others Received Threatening Debt Collection Calls Huntley v. [read post]