Search for: "People v Jamal Green"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2012, 5:55 am
Jamal Greene has an insightful essay over at Slate on the Supreme Court’s role in ruling on ACA’s constitutionality. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:07 pm
The following essay by Jamal Greene is part of our thirty-day series on John Paul Stevens. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 7:01 am
Significantly, the court described litigation in a state case, People v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 8:32 am
(coauthored with Stephen Ansolabehere and crossposted) Upon the initiative of my colleague Jamal Greene who has been writing about the popularity of originalism, our July survey included several questions concerning judicial methodology. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
If the thirty-one essays in SCOTUSblog’s series on John Paul Stevens convey any message in unison, it is that the retired Justice believes in definite limits on the role of a judge (Frederick Schauer, Rodger Citron, Andrew Siegel, Jamal Greene, Joseph Thai, James Liebman). [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 7:08 pm
There is a cool article here on the “Anti-Canon” in constitutional law, by Jamal Greene. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:03 am
Waryck, Constitutional Redemption and Constitutional Faith: Introduction Sanford Levinson, How I Lost My Constitutional Faith Jamal Greene, Fourteenth Amendment Originalism Aziz Rana, Freedom Struggles and the Limits of Constitutional Continuity Gerald Torres and Lani Guinier, The Constitutional Imaginary: Just Stories About We the People Mark A. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 12:42 am
Jamal Green QUEENS COUNTYEvidenceTranscript of Expert Deposition Taken Three Months After Notice of Trial Is Inadmissible Bajaj v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:35 am
On broader issues, Jamal Greene, guest-posting at Balkinization, discusses the success of originalism as a conservative intellectual movement and argues that progressive intellectuals cannot expect to effect similar doctrinal changes. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am
Few people feel that way today. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:40 am
Recently Jamal Greene has argued that judges often use originalist arguments whenever they are construing a piece of constitutional text that looks to them like a rule but is ambiguous. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm
On 29 January 2019 Arcadia and Sir Philip Green discontinued their action against the Daily Telegraph. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
” Greene labels a few of the most odious Supreme Court decisions—Dred Scott v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
” became a term of denunciation, Jamal Greene shows, as both liberals and conservatives united in their repudiation of the case. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 2:48 pm
In the closest thing we have to a canonical article about the anticanon, Columbia law Professor Jamal Greene identifies Dred Scott v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:21 am
Circuit opinion of Seven-Sky v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
That has won him praise even from some liberal legal scholars who think he was wrong about most substantive issues, including Cass Sunstein and Jamal Greene. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 3:30 pm
Ferguson (separate is equal); Lochner v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 6:08 pm
More recently, he minimized the significance of the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi Arabian consulate in Turkey by repeatedly stating that Khashoggi was “not a citizen. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:35 pm
Š. v. [read post]
