Search for: "People v Johnson (Michael)"
Results 1 - 20
of 378
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am
These Phonorecords IV rates are in effect for five years, but the next negotiation for new rates is coming soon (called Phonorecords V or PR V for short). [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”If people like Johnson, Rufo, or Orban “were serious about addressing the resentments of an excluded voter base … [they] wouldn’t focus on universities at all. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
Michael Dreeben rejected this argument. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm
Johnson. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:28 pm
Johnson, a case which raises the issue of whether a law that criminalizes camping on public property by homeless people who have nowhere else to qualifies as "cruel and unusual punishment" under the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Normative foundations of business may include the moral and not only economic value of promises, morally articulated fiduciary duties of agency (including duties of care, candor, and loyalty), and the obligation to show respect to all business participants, including a moral imperative to treat employees and customers as people who deserve dignity and due recognition – and not merely as means to the ends of making profits for others.[20] Adam Smith and his followers in contemporary… [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Michael A. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
The Parliament Buildings at Stormont © 2024 Northern Ireland Assembly Commission For the entirety of its existence, Northern Ireland’s relationship within the United Kingdom has dominated its politics, its culture and its people. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
He makes a similar inference (at 61) from the silence of most people on the issue of self-execution. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
The Claimants Michael Turner and Nikki Sanderson have sought permission to appeal the damages they were awarded. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm
In 1997, in Boerne v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 12:01 pm
In People v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 4:54 am
Youssef, Carrie Keller-Lynn, Michael R. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
On the same day, Johnson J heard the trial in the case of Shafi v New Vision TV Limited and another QB-2021-00443.6 On 4 to 8 December 2023 HHJ Parkes KC heard the trial in the case of Wilson v Mendelsohn and others QB-2021-002673. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
" And in Trump v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
The lawyers are Robert Cheeley, Kenneth Chesebro, Jeffrey Clark, Matthew DePerno, John Eastman, Jenna Ellis, Michael Farina, Rudy Giuliani, Julia Haller, Scott Hagerstrom, Brandon Johnson, Stephanie Juntilla, Christopher M. [read post]
