Search for: "People v Joseph Garcia" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Copyright Law On 18 May 2015, the 9th Circuit, sitting en banc, handed down a judgment in Garcia v Google [pdf]. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:53 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Garcia: control for age/heavy streaming v. political savvy/politically involved: how many people who listen to Olivia Rodrigo are also paying attention to Trump rallies? [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 2:27 am
Zelon.Split in DistrictDespite conceding that Manchel's argument held such "considerable appeal" that another division in the district had recently accepted it in People v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 1:34 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 15 October 2024 there was a trial of a preliminary issue in the data protection case of  Joseph Pacini, Carsten Geyer v Dow Jones & Company Inc. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:05 pm by Law Lady
Joseph's Regional Medical Center July 15, 2010, for treatment of dehydration and a swollen throat that prevented her from swallowing her own saliva, according to the petition for excess damages. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
National Trial Competition // Syracuse University School of Law (January 30-31, 2015) Coach: Joel Seidemann Team Members: Luis Felix (3L), Joseph Fortunato (3L), Kenyon Griffin (3L), Matt Reno (3L) The competition involved a case of People of the State of Lone Star v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Tort tries to get people to make safer products to encourage innovation, but also leads to anxieties about creating new stuff b/c it risks litigation v. doing what everyone else is already doing. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Kelly said, "It's one thing when people sell their blood for money; it's another when they sell their drugs, especially when the diversion compromises the pharmaceutical supply with tainted and outdated drugs. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]