Search for: "People v Kenny" Results 1 - 20 of 104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
The ICO also published new guidance for all organisations considering using people’s biometric data. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
See also South Hetton Coal Co v North-Eastern News Association [1894] 1 QB 133; Jones v Halton [1909] 2 KB 444; Browne v DC Thomson & Co [1912] SC 359; Irish People’s Assurance Society v City of Dublin Assurance Company Ltd [1929] IR 25 (SC); Knuppfer v London Express Newspaper Ltd [1944] AC 116, [1944] UKHL 1 (03 April 1944); Awolowo v Zik Enterprises… [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Phil Dixon
Officer was entitled to qualified immunity on First Amendment claim relating to livestreaming of a traffic stop, but claim for Town’s policy against livestreaming may proceed Sharpe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” MGFB submitted evidence of confusion, e.g., a musician who often performed at the Lounge said multiple people asked her about the series “and if [she] had met any of the people on the television show. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
Moreover, the exercise of constitutional rights “may be regulated by the Oireachtas when the common good requires this” (Ryan v Attorney General [1965] IR 294, 312 (HC; Kenny J) affd [1965] IR 294, 345, [1965] IESC 1 (3 July 1965) [23] (Ó Dálaigh CJ; Lavery, Kingsmill Moore, Haugh and Walsh JJ concurring); see, recently, Burke v Minister for Education [2022] IESC 1 (24 January 2022) [95] (O’Donnell… [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 9:59 am by CMS
In this post, Kenny Henderson and Alex Askew of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Lloyd v Google LLC [2021] UKSC 50, which concerned whether a representative data protection action seeking damages for loss of control of personal data could be brought on behalf of large numbers of unidentifiable class members. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
The pageant does limit itself to people "born … Female with Female Anatomy. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
The privilege exists because people need to be free to discuss formal allegations made in official court proceedings being considered by governmental actors. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am by CMS
In this post, Kenny Henderson, Temi Orekunrin and Megan O’Neill of CMS summarise the second day of submissions in the appeal of Lloyd v Google LLC. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:33 am by CMS
In this post, Kenny Henderson and Zainab Hodgson of CMS summarise the first day of submissions in the appeal of Lloyd v Google LLC, which concerns a claim alleging that the appellant (‘Google’) breached its duties as a data controller to over 4m Apple iPhone users during a period of some months in 2011- 2012, when Google was able to collect and use their browser generated information. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am by CMS
The proposed class is vast, comprising an estimated 46.2 million people. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am by CMS
This is because the case will be suitable to proceed as a class action if some issues, including common impact, may be resolved for a class of people using common evidence at a common issues trial. [read post]