Search for: "People v Knox" Results 41 - 60 of 133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2009, 7:35 am by Thomas Swartz
"  The Court of Appeals was face with this issue yesterday in People v Knox, 2009 NY Slip Op 01156.The case actually involved three separate criminal cases. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 7:35 am by Thomas Swartz
"  The Court of Appeals was face with this issue yesterday in People v Knox, 2009 NY Slip Op 01156.The case actually involved three separate criminal cases. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 7:35 am by Thomas Swartz
"  The Court of Appeals was face with this issue yesterday in People v Knox, 2009 NY Slip Op 01156.The case actually involved three separate criminal cases. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 11:51 am by Catherine Fisk
Friedrichs was rushed through the lower courts without any factual record, apparently in response to the Court’s 2012 opinion in Knox v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:20 am by Cormac Early
Briefly: In her Opinionator column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses Knox v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:34 am by SHG
The first time the words appeared, it was in an amicus brief filed in Williams v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  John Randolph's enslaved people (Knox Pages).Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
Generations of people in the community were poisoned by lead, arsenic and other toxic substances, resulting in a devastating array of physical and mental illnesses and in some cases, death. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:52 am
One of the few cases reported concerning violations of §106 is People v Knox, l78 AD 344, a case decided in 1903, in which the Appellate Division ruled that a civil service commission may disqualify an applicant where it finds that fraud or deception has been practiced. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 2:36 pm by Josh Blackman
This switcheroo might be the quickest SCOTUS self-reversal since Knox v. [read post]
In a July 8 letter, CMPB's attorneys, Knox Lemmon Anapolsky LLP, claim that the slogan infinges upon CMPB's ten-year-old "got milk? [read post]