Search for: "People v Larkins" Results 21 - 40 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2019, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
Larkin Jr., Cato Supreme Court Review; earlier on Kisor; Cato podcast with Ilya Shapiro (“Auer deference could become minute deference”), William Yeatman and Caleb Brown] “Gundy and the (Sort-of) Resurrection of the Subdelegation Doctrine” [Gary Lawson, Cato Supreme Court Review, earlier on Gundy v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:34 am
Still, on the brighter side, in only a couple more years I'll be in a different age group, albeit a couple of years nearer to death...The reference to Larkin reminded me of perhaps his best known poem This Be The Verse, famously quoted by Lord Justice Wall in CP v AR & Anor last year. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:22 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Larkin Fair Use Likely Protects Discussion of Blog Post and Comments Another Blogger Wins a Fair Use Defense For a Photo–Leveyfilm v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 11:02 am by Eric Goldman
Other rulings we’ve mentioned this year include Denison v Larkin (copying blog posts in disciplinary proceeding); Katz v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 1:07 am
Larkin Subscription Required NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal Practice Court Denies Consolidation of All Three Dockets, Granting Consolidation of Only Two People v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 3:06 am
In re Joel Embiid, 2021 USPQ2d 577 (TTAB 2021) [precedential[ (Opinion by Judge Christopher Larkin). [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 3:33 am by Russ Bensing
  The 10th District has twice upheld the application of the statute in somewhat similar circumstances:  a Brady violation at trial in Larkins v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:11 am by Henry Oliver
When the House of Lords gave the Home Secretary permission to arrest and detain people indefinitely during World War II (Liversidge v Anderson [1941] UKHL 1) Lord Atkin gave a powerful dissenting speech: “In this county, amid the clash of arms, the law is not silent. [read post]