Search for: "People v Levelle" Results 1 - 20 of 12,135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2010, 10:33 am by Michael Froomkin
People deeply embedded in the Comcast v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 1:32 am
In People v Brewer (2009 NY Slip Op 04548 4th Dept 6/5/09) the Court reduced the defendant's SORA level from a level three to a level two even though the defendant was presumptively a level three risk pursuant to the risk assessment instrument. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 7:47 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The answer will determine whether he is a Level 2 sex offender based on the facts, the court says yes. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:56 am by Hillary Byrnes
The post Symposium: The Constitution provides a level playing field for people of faith appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 7:47 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The answer will determine whether he is a Level 2 sex offender based on the facts, the court says yes. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 5:25 pm by Stephen Bilkis
2018 NY Slip 00005 By order of the Supreme Court on May 13, 2016, which heard a case against the defendant who is a level 1 sex offender. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 10:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
2018 Slip Op 00855 This case was an appeal from the Supreme Court, where the defendant was categorized as a Level Two sex offender. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 5:25 pm by Stephen Bilkis
2018 NY Slip 00005 By order of the Supreme Court on May 13, 2016, which heard a case against the defendant who is a level 1 sex offender. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 1:26 pm by charonqc
” [Come off it.... not even a hoodie flicking V signs is going to be taken in by such a wonderfully paternal and patronising statement] [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 10:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
2018 Slip Op 00855 This case was an appeal from the Supreme Court, where the defendant was categorized as a Level Two sex offender. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 7:18 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Ellis In this case the People assert that the defendant is a level 3 sex offender. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:33 pm by SO Issues
Although defendant pleaded guilty to a count of the indictment alleging that he raped his stepdaughter when she was 13 years old, it is well settled that, in assessing a defendant's risk level, the court is not limited to the crime to which the defendant pleaded guilty (see People v Scott, 71 A.D.3d 1417, 1417-1418, lv denied 14 N.Y.3d 714; People v Hubel, 70 A.D.3d 1492, 1493). [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:00 pm
Or even low-level "investments," like the ones here, where you're getting five figures from people in your church to market a dubious product on the basis of exceptionally dubious representations. [read post]