Search for: "People v Long (Rebecca)" Results 1 - 20 of 271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2022, 7:23 am by Eric Goldman
Whitepages The post Another Tough Ruling for People Search Databases–Camacho v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:37 am by INFORRM
The ‘zonal argument’ occasionally advanced by tabloid defendants – that an expose is ‘fair game’ because the claimant placed certain elements of information in the public domain – has been long-discredited in English misuse of private information law (McKennitt v Ash [2006] EWCA Civ 1714, Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers [2021] EWHC 273 [86]). [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 1:19 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
This is a guest post by Rebecca Shaeffer, a legal caseworker at Fair Trials International. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am by NFS Esq.
08/18/2011 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA REBECCA HOWELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Katz, The Role of Public Reason in Obergefell v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:06 am by Eric Goldman
” We trimmed the chapter down substantially, including major surgery on the way-too-long Nike v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:00 am
 The panel then discussed whether five years is too long a time to allow people to claim broad monopolies without any actual use. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
And here's Part I, which argues that authors have long based characters on real people, and have a constitutional right to do so: Creators have long worked real famous people into their fictional stories, and they have a First Amendment right to do so. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rigidity v. flexibility: advocates for more specific defenses. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
By Rebecca Tushnet and Eric GoldmanTrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by MICHAEL ETIENNE, MATRIX
Rebecca Steinfeld and Charles Keidan represent a growing number of people who are deeply opposed to what they see as the pervasive patriarchal trappings of marriage. [read post]