Search for: "People v Mark Watson"
Results 1 - 20
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:43 am
It argues that the Federal Circuit erred in holding that the refusal to register a mark under Section 2(c) violates the First Amendment when the mark contains criticism of a government official or public figure. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
Australia’s highest court emphatically rejected the relevance of reputation in either the allegedly infringing or infringed mark is relevant to the assessment of deceptive similarity, ruling that PROTOX and “instant BOTOX alternative” do not infringe the registered trade mark BOTOX. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
The purpose is to show that this defendant was put in fear by these people. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
Since President Biden issued his July 2021 Executive Order on Competition, the antitrust agencies have made broad policy statements promising more aggressive enforcement and have initiated a number of high-profile enforcement actions. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:49 am
Watson was an Assistant U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
IPKat has a post on the China’s image rights and the threshold for protection of the right to likeness following the publication of the nine “Typical civil cases of judicial protection of personality rights after the promulgation of the Civil Code of China” from the Supreme People’s Court of China. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Supreme Court decision in 2013, and another this year, weakened the landmark law, while Republican-controlled Legislatures passed new voting restrictions advocates say target people of color, as well as young and working-class people. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Watson (Georgia), Sonja R. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am
Mark and Casey file jointly. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 6:10 pm
Mark Zuckerberg bragging about controlling “billions of people’s stolen data, all their secrets, their lives, their futures. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:37 pm
Where as in People v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Wednesday, June 5, 2019 11:30 AM Conference Registration Opens 12:45—1:00 PM Conference Welcoming Remarks Larry Singer, Loyola University Chicago School of Law Edward Hutchinson, ASLME 1:00—3:00 PM Jay Healey Teaching Plenary Session, Ceremonial Courtroom, 10th Floor Moderators: Larry Singer, Loyola University Chicago School of Law Charity Scott, Georgia State College of Law Sidney Watson, Saint Louis University School of Law 3:15—4:30 PM Concurrent Sessions 1 A. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
In Cooper v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm
” Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]
