Search for: "People v Melendez"
Results 41 - 60
of 134
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2012, 3:47 am
Melendez, 2012 U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
In People v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 11:56 am
" Id. citing People v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:12 am
Melendez v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:21 pm
Washington, (prosecution may not introduce testimonial hearsay against the defendant), Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
The Court then determined that this error was harmless, since the defendant had confessed.Whether the holding of People v Brown (13 NY3d 332) was correct will likely be decided by the Supreme Court in Williams v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 5:54 am
In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:25 am
Sackett v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:41 am
“ I’d suggested at the time that the opinion was possibly too broad, and sure enough, a year later, in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:01 am
In its recent opinion in Bullcoming v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 7:31 pm
" In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts (129 S.Ct. 2527 [2009]), the Supreme Court held that it violate the right of confrontation for a prosecutor to submit a chemical drug test report without the testimony of a person who performed the test subject to confrontation. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 1:57 pm
Well, we can all thank a little case call Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:52 am
In People v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:32 pm
Or what your client was doing at the time.DAWSON In People v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:32 pm
Or what your client was doing at the time.DAWSON In People v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:13 pm
The Court, in a majority opinion authored by Justice Ginsburg, reinforced the Court’s 2009 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:25 am
Illinois, No. 10-8505, seeking review of People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:25 am
Illinois, No. 10-8505, seeking review of People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:36 am
Illinois, No. 10-8505, seeking review of People v. [read post]