Search for: "People v Melendez" Results 41 - 60 of 134
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2012, 8:21 am by Brian Shiffrin
The Court then determined that this error was harmless, since the defendant had confessed.Whether the holding of People v Brown (13 NY3d 332) was correct will likely be decided by the Supreme Court in Williams v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:41 am by Russ Bensing
“  I’d suggested at the time that the opinion was possibly too broad, and sure enough, a year later, in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:01 am by Aaron Tang
In its recent opinion in Bullcoming v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts (129 S.Ct. 2527 [2009]), the Supreme Court held that it violate the right of confrontation for a prosecutor to submit a chemical drug test report without the testimony of a person who performed the test subject to confrontation. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:32 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Or what your client was doing at the time.DAWSON In People v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:32 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Or what your client was doing at the time.DAWSON In People v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:13 pm by Lovechilde
The Court, in a majority opinion authored by Justice Ginsburg, reinforced the Court’s 2009 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]