Search for: "People v Melendez" Results 81 - 100 of 134
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2010, 12:45 am by Indefensible
Thanks to my old colleague Frank for passing this to me:Some Excerpts from United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:08 pm by Matt Cameron
I’ll have more to say about this shortly, but here are a few immediate thoughts: Padilla is kind of an interesting counterpoint to last year’s monumental Sixth Amendment ruling in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 11:33 am by Nicole Mazzocco
On March 4, 2010, the Michigan Court of Appeals approved its opinion in People v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
Sure, the requirements of the unavailability of the witness in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:53 am by jamison
  His recent update on the Melendez v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 2:41 am by SHG
Why, if the Supremes were going to issue a one sentence per curiam opinion in Briscoe v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 10:54 am by Jeff Gamso
Last week we learned that Judge Berchelmann doesn't think there should be any sanction imposed on Sharon Keller.Yesterday, we saw that the Supreme Court declined its own invitation to overrule (or at least weaken) Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 5:55 am by Brian Shiffrin
For example, the Court in People v Rawlins and People v Meekins (10 N.Y.3d 136 [2/19/2008]), considered how Crawford applies two categories of evidence: DNA reports and , fingerprints, comparisons. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 11:59 am by Dane Johnson
Virginia, We vacate the Judgment of the Supreme Court of Virginia and remand the case for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm by Gideon
It can remind us to be better people, to engage in public service and to help others who are not as fortunate. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm by Erin Miller
Well, only four days after the Court decided Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Over the weekend the New York Times ran a story by Adam Liptak previewing a US Supreme Court case ("Justices revisit rule requiring lab testimony," Dec. 19) called Briscoe v. [read post]