Search for: "People v Modest"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,145
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am
In the months since Republicans regained control of the U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 2:37 pm
From Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion yesterday in The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:56 pm
[xv] See Footnote v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:41 am
”But people accused in federal court obtained the right to counsel twenty-five years earlier in Johnson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:59 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:55 am
First, the amount and duration of the Fernandes litigation was relatively modest, the election just three months late and made almost immediately after the Court denied dismissal of the petition. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 4:32 am
High profile cases are an entirely different matter, and Judge Lewis Kaplan in U.S. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
From yesterday's opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
In most legal orgs, this percentage is near negligible, especially if the org is being honest with itself about (i) how many personnel in putative innovation roles (legal operations, knowledge management, project management) are consumed by active matters, existing programs, and administration, (ii) how much technology spend is maintenance, and (iii) how many projects are purely aspirational with no real resources save the illusory spare hours of already busy people. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Joseph FishkinMost writers and scholars (perhaps most people in general?) [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:26 am
Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Ciminelli v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 11:02 am
Liberdon's content limitations seem relatively modest, as these things go, and I understand them to be warnings about what will get people banned (a risk I'm willing to run) rather than promises on my part not to engage in certain speech. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
”As the Supreme Court famously explained in Marbury v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:11 am
As a matter of U.S. government policy, people generally do not receive notice of this surveillance, even after the surveillance has ended and even where notice would not jeopardize an active investigation. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 9:36 am
Driver v CPS The second development is Knowles J’s decision in Driver v CPS [2022] EWHC 2500 (KB) which involved an email sent to a member of the public by a CPS lawyer about a criminal investigation in which the claimant politician was a suspect. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 1:16 pm
But certainly there are ample tools to punish such people for the homicide itself. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 3:48 pm
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
