Search for: "People v New York State Dept. of Corrections" Results 21 - 40 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2007, 1:23 am
City of New York Dept. of Citywide Administrative Services BRONX COUNTYCriminal PracticePerjury Conviction is Independent Circumstance Attesting to Unreliability of Declaration People v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 10:26 am by Donald Thompson
 In Handling a Criminal Case in New York § 23:35 [2013], Gary Muldoon notes that “[i]t is a basic tenet of appellate practice that it is improper for an attorney to argue matters that are dehors (outside) the record on appeal” (see also, e.g., People v Chiles, 70 AD3d 1453 [4th Dept 2010]). [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:32 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), March 9, 2000 Categories Included: Corrections Law, Criminal Procedure Law, Judiciary Law, Penal Law and Chapter Laws Enacted during report period: CORRECTIONS LAW: Bill No. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State actors are the State of New York, Governor of the State of New York, the New York State Board of Regents, the New York State Education Department, and the New York State Commissioner of Education (collectively the State). [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State actors are the State of New York, Governor of the State of New York, the New York State Board of Regents, the New York State Education Department, and the New York State Commissioner of Education (collectively the State). [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 2:19 pm
Telech, 47 A.D. 2d 997, 366 N.Y.S. 2d 750 (4th Dept. 1975); People v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:39 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run   June 22, 2008. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:20 pm
On February 1, a unanimous five-judge panel of the New York State Appellate Division, Fourth Department, which is based in Buffalo, ruled in Martinez v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The clear and convincing evidence standard is an intermediate standard between the high standard of ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ used in criminal proceedings and ‘fair preponderance ’ used in ordinary civil proceedings as held in Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Servs. v. [read post]