Search for: "People v Nix" Results 61 - 80 of 115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:05 pm by Tony Mauro
The protests marked the two-year anniversary Saturday of the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 7:02 am
But it's also why we need to sort of make clear when we know that the client is lying (a complicated dance that the Supreme Court cooked up in Nix v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:50 am
"See a list of ILB entries on the Court of Appeals decision in the case of Morrison v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:06 am by Steve Hall
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:09 am by Mark Movsesian
"  But the Biebl was nixed by the school administrators on the grounds that "the title and meaning…had religious connotations and would be easily identified as such by attendees. [read post]