Search for: "People v Packer" Results 1 - 20 of 59
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For a constitutional theory to be (minimally) acceptable, it must preserve the result in Brown v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 4:42 pm by Bona Law PC
Department of Education (USDA) to consider issuing (i) new rules under the Packers and Stockyards Act making it easier for farmers to bring and win claims, stopping chicken processors from exploiting and underpaying chicken farmers, and adopting anti-retaliation protections for farmers who speak out about bad practices; (ii) new rules defining when meat can bear “Product of USA” labels, so that consumers have accurate, transparent labels that enable them to choose products made… [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
FTDA cases do have slightly lower mean frequency v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 9:02 pm by Guest Contributor
Essentially, this tongue-in-cheek line can be interpreted as saying we don’t tolerate dishonest people who want to “rent” pigs. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
Thanks to the New York Times and Matt Richtel for “Tainted Pork, Ill Consumers and an Investigation Thwarted. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:00 am by Zach Abels
“It’s ruthlessness that cows people. [read post]