Search for: "People v Pataki"
Results 41 - 60
of 76
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2009, 11:52 pm
Yes, criminal defendants are going to lose some too -- like Michigan v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 3:31 pm
Thereafter, as a result of the Stipulation of Settlement in Doe v Pataki, he was afforded a new hearing on his sex offender status, utilizing a new risk assessment instrument. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm
Pataki back in 2008. [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 11:19 am
After all, the background of Marbury v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm
See People v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 2:07 pm
Google, Maughan v Google, and Murawski v Pataki [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:54 pm
Pataki, 930 F. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 4:08 pm
To the oral argument of the Citizens Against Casino Gambling v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
It May Confuse People And It May Be A Crime. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 5:44 pm
Examples: * LICRA v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:51 am
California Appellate Districts, April 08, 2008 People v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 5:43 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:20 pm
The conservative upstate court, whose judges were elected by voters in Western New York and four of whom were appointed to the Appellate Division by Governor George Pataki, concluded that the 2006 decision by New York's highest court, Hernandez v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am
services that can profitably pursue this option, they would engage in massive overremovals and giving fewer people access to their publication tools. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:44 pm
Pataki. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 7:42 am
California Appellate Districts, January 30, 2008 People v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 8:50 am
The two cases before the court were Godfrey v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
