Search for: "People v Patel"
Results 1 - 20
of 187
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2014, 4:34 pm
Lamparello, Adam, City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Patel v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Patel. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 3:06 pm
In Patel v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:28 pm
The Fourth Amendment protects "people, not places", but in applying it the courts seem to care quite a bit about places, too. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 12:38 pm
Rearden LLC v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
However, both tiers of the tribunal dismissed Mr Patel’s appeal. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:01 pm
Patel: Don't worry like I said only people with the link can view it!! [read post]
[Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz] Los Angeles v. Patel and the constitutional structure of judicial review
6 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
., the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Los Angeles v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:46 am
The ruling in Patel v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:05 am
" Then, Young shot Patel several times after Patel had moved off screen. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:16 am
That is constitutional for junkyards, but, no, people are not the same as wrecked cars.The second case is Kingsley v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 10:54 am
For EFF's brief: https://www.eff.org/document/eff-amicus-los-angeles-v-patel For more information on the case: https://www.eff.org/cases/city-los-angeles-v-patel Contact: Dave Maass Media Relations Coordinator Electronic Frontier Foundation press@eff.org Share this: || Join EFF [read post]
[Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz] Los Angeles v. Patel and the constitutional structure of judicial review
9 Jul 2015, 5:17 am
Sibron v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:20 pm
SharePatel v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 10:13 am
Patel, R (on the application of) v Lord Chancellor [2010] EWHC 2220 (Admin) (27 August 2010) – Read judgment The wife of the purported ringleader of the ’7/7? [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm
Patel. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 9:53 am
But I'm absolutely committed to telling people the truth.That article by The Verge (a website that actually did a great job covering the Epic Games v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 4:53 pm
But the fact that (1) there's a dissent, (2) both the majority opinion and the dissent are authored by people who teach as adjuncts at the University of San Diego School of Law, (3) the attorney for plaintiff and respondent (James Mitchell) is a USD Law graduate, and (4) the holding has broad implications for many different types of real estate option contracts persuaded me to give my two cent's worth.I think that the trial court properly awarded specific performance, and that… [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:17 am
Split 5-4, in the same pattern as in Patel. [read post]
