Search for: "People v Perez-Rodriguez"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
Rodriguez, et al. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:45 am
University May Be Liable for Improper Access to Student’s Facebook Photos – Rodriguez v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 11:06 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 12:00 pm
Perez-Medina gets two black marks, one for lack of experience, one for being endorsed by people I mistrust. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 11:53 am
Aff. (1694) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 People ex rel. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
People v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 10:22 am
Although not directly on point, see Rodriguez v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:04 pm
feature=player_embedded&v=wyx6JDQCslE&oref=http%3A%2F%2Fs.ytimg.com%2Fyt%2Fswfbin%2Fwatch_as3-vfl3J-I2Q.swf&has_verified=1COUNTY COURTTop rated as Exceptionally Qualified: Judge Steve Leifman - 54%Judge Andrea Wolfson - 52%Judge Charlie Johnson - 49%Judge Sam Slom - 47% Lowest Percentage of Unqualified votes: Judge Luise Krieger Martin - 5.10%Judge Leifman - 5.35%Judge Slom - 5.41%Judge Johnson - 5.60%Judge Shelly Kravitz - 5.67% Highest Percentage of… [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Perez (Oregon)Elektra v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
United States, 16-8675, and Rodriguez v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Rodriguez, No. 06-20774 Convictions and sentences concerning participation in a single, broad conspiracy to transport many aliens to Houston are affirmed where: 1.) two appellants depended on the aliens' transportation to Houston for their full payment, though they did not intend to take any aliens to Houston themselves; and 2.) third appellant knew that many aliens would be transported by trailer well past Robstown. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Rodriguez, Mayra Martinez Suarez, Laura Diaz, Juan Prieto, Flavia Perez, Jose Antonio Diaz, and Johny Hernandez. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Rodriguez, Mayra Martinez Suarez, Laura Diaz, Juan Prieto, Flavia Perez, Jose Antonio Diaz, and Johny Hernandez. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
"
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 23, 2007US v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
BLIX STREET RECORDS, INC. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
BLIX STREET RECORDS, INC. v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
But it seems to me that people are overlooking the obvious answer: While many people were hoping and praying during the bleak dull days of October Term 2016 that the Supreme Court would finally get some interesting cases, nobody thought to wish that the court would ever actually decide them. [read post]
9 May 2021, 7:06 pm
Rafael Velazquez Perez and I have posted the draft of an essay, which we first presented at the Associativity of the Study of the Cuban Economic January 2021 Conference. [read post]
