Search for: "People v Rafferty"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2022, 6:12 pm
Tisi is a shareholder with Levin Papantonio Rafferty. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:35 am
“With the loss of Victoria, thousands if not hundreds of thousands of people felt a tremendous loss worldwide. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 5:09 pm
He is actively involved in several pending Multi-District Litigations (MDLs), including Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder/Ovarian Cancer (MDL No. 2738) and Proton Pump Inhibitor/Kidney Disease (MDL No. 2789).About Levin Papantonio RaffertyThe Levin Papantonio Rafferty law firm has been representing injured people across the globe since 1955. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 5:56 pm
"Corporate media has allowed this to happen because they chose advertising money over the health of people all over America," Papantonio said. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 1:04 pm
In 2017, he served as co-lead counsel in Vigneron v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:38 am
Walgreens liability depositions taken by Mougey and Gaddy have played in every trial against Walgreens in federal and state court.New Mexico v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
The Colorado Supreme Court ruling in "People of the State of Colorado v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 6:16 am
As a result, these victims suffered severe harassment.Where Liability Enters the PicturePhelps explained that videos appearing on adult websites from production companies like GirlsDoPorn that are known to use threats, fraud, coercion, or fraudulent contracts written when people are lied to and/or intoxicated. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Optis v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
Mrs Justice Rafferty noted the Croatian cases, and the observation of Cranston J in Coombes v Waltham Forest LBC [2010] EWHC 666 Admin that There is an obvious conflict between the Strasbourg jurisprudence and our own However, following Husband v Solihull MBC [2009] EWHC 3673 (Admin) and Wandsworth LBC v Dixon [2009] EWHC 27 [links to our reports], Qazi was held to be solid precdent that the rule in Monk was compatible with Art 8. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
Mrs Justice Rafferty noted the Croatian cases, and the observation of Cranston J in Coombes v Waltham Forest LBC [2010] EWHC 666 Admin that There is an obvious conflict between the Strasbourg jurisprudence and our own However, following Husband v Solihull MBC [2009] EWHC 3673 (Admin) and Wandsworth LBC v Dixon [2009] EWHC 27 [links to our reports], Qazi was held to be solid precdent that the rule in Monk was compatible with Art 8. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:22 am
Co. v Rafferty, 17 AD3d 888, 889 [2005]). [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 5:40 pm
From People v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 7:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
The Court of Appeal (Chancellor, Laws and Rafferty LJJ) heard the appeal in Berezovksy v Terluk over three days, 1, 2 and 3 November 2011. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm
Michael Varey v People: The complaint was of harassment by a photographer commissioned via an agency. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am
The ICO plans to write to more than 1,000 companies, which it believes are involved in buying and selling people’s names and numbers, as part of its ongoing crackdown on cold callers. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm
Makudi v Triesman, 28 November 2013 (Laws, Tomlinson and Rafferty LJJ). [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:27 am
We note that, although there has not been a jury trial in a libel case for nearly a year, a civil jury trial is commencing on the Royal Courts of Justice on Monday 21 June 2010 before Mrs Justice Rafferty. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: WXY v Gewanter, heard 11-15, 18-19 July 2011 (Slade J) Morrison v Buckinghamshire CC, heard 20 to 21 July (HHJ Parkes QC) Flood v Times Newspapers, heard 17 and 18 October 2011 (Supreme Court) Cambridge v Makin, heard 3 November 2011 (Hughes, Black and Tomlinson LJJ) Berzevoksy v Terluk, heard 1, 2 and 3 November 2011 (The Chancellor, Laws and Rafferty LJJ). [read post]
