Search for: "People v Ramos-Perez"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm
As a corollary to the right to criminal counsel, non-English speaking individuals have the right to an interpreter to enable them to participate meaningfully in their trial and assist in their own defense (see People v Ramos, 26 NY2d 272, 274 [1970]; People v Perez, 198 AD2d 446, 447 [1993]; People v De Armas, 106 AD2d 659). [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:26 am
In the ensuing lawsuit, Dowd v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 18-5838, Perez v. [read post]
