Search for: "People v Robert Majors"
Results 81 - 100
of 3,295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2015, 7:50 am
Adding Evenwel v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 10:05 am
There Chief Justice John Roberts cited then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s dissent from denial of rehearing en banc in United States Telecom Assn. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 1:29 pm
Roberts, No. 12-1671 (4th Cir. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:11 am
Just a year before Prigg in 1841, Story penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 6:14 am
The majority opinion—in which Roberts joined his fellow conservative Justices—did not directly address claims about religious freedom. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:56 am
In Rehaif v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:27 pm
In 1964, in Reynolds v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:47 am
Roberts, Jr., and Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
The Problem with Affirmative Action After Grutter: Some Reflections on Fisher v. University of Texas
6 Mar 2012, 8:30 pm
It’s official: the Supreme Court will hear Fisher v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:01 pm
Earlier coverage of Miller v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 11:50 am
The case, Merrill v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
In Nebraska, he government argued that the major question doctrine rule from West Virginia v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 5:57 am
Chief Justice John Roberts’s majority opinion did not overrule Chevron deference. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
Justice Robert H. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 8:08 pm
“Under the law as approved, ‘people will be confused,’ Roberts said. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 2:08 am
As you know by now, in the opinion issued in Shelby County v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:56 am
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, stated that “[t]he Department’s policy expressly discriminates against otherwise eligible recipients by disqualifying them from a public benefit solely because of their religious character. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 11:38 am
Many passages in Chief Justice Roberts’s opinion for the majority were dedicated to offering guideposts and guardrails for the applicability of the major questions doctrine as a canon of statutory interpretation. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 6:28 pm
At trial, the prosecution presented evidence showing that Robert Adams asked Major Moten to check with Davis to see if he was selling cocaine. [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:05 pm
The Sixth Circuit deplored this “subjective intent” approach, which “made seemingly easy cases hard and reached results that are questionable at best,” Robert, 507 F.3d at 990-991. [read post]
