Search for: "People v Robert Thomas" Results 41 - 60 of 1,931
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2011, 3:28 pm
Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito joined Justice Kennedy's opinion. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 8:30 pm by Khiara M. Bridges
for a 4-4 split – with Justices Breyer, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kennedy on one side and Justices Alito, Roberts, Scalia, and Thomas on the other. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm by Ronald Collins
Answer: I’m sure there will be people who disagree, but the answer is “yes. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm by Ronald Collins
Hills, Jr., Bradley Joondeph, Thomas Lambert, Richard Lazarus, J. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:32 pm by lennyesq
Justices Thomas and Kavanaugh filed concurring opinions. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:11 pm by Danielle Citron
(Roberts preferred a more lenient standard than Alito; Scalia and Thomas dissented.) [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Judge Porteous also engaged in corrupt conduct after the Lifemark v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 7:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
So Thomas can continue to be the Court's most extreme Justice or he can be a key driver of the doctrine's direction, but he can't be both.Toobin gives the example of the Mississippi abortion case on the docket for next term as an opportunity for Thomas to showcase his leadership, presumably by frontally overruling Roe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:23 am by Mark Graber
  Alito, joined by Roberts and Thomas, did not take either of these routes. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 7:35 am
Even though SCOTUSblog will competently cover Snyder v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 1:21 pm
Lithwick doesn't think the meanness factor is really the issue, but she's struggling to put her finger on her real problem with the Roberts Court...Now maybe the Roberts Five [Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, & Alito] really are bilious and rageful. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am by Michael C. Dorf
President and Fellows of Harvard College, Justice Thomas writes: "The Court’s opinion rightly makes clear that Grutter [v. [read post]