Search for: "People v Robert Thomas"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,931
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
Note especially that Thomas’s concurrence calls not only for the end of contraception protection, but also for overturning Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:05 pm
See Thomas More Law Center, et al. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:26 pm
And for Masterpiece, there were already four: Roberts, plus Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am
(Roberts invoked standing in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:42 pm
Roberts Jr. wrote for the majority, that the reports should have been turned over under Brady v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:10 am
Nothing surprising there.But unlike the usual case, where Kennedy's the swing vote, this time the swing vote that adds the fifth vote to the four conservatives (Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito) is . . . . [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:45 am
See Cutter v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 7:28 am
One small worry: Kennedy, Alito, Thomas, Roberts, and Scalia all refused to join parts of the opinion, the first two for vaguely libertarian reasons relating to the benefits of free markets. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:50 am
What Ricci v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 8:41 am
CommentUpon reading the exchange between Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Thomas, this Kat is content that the Court ruled as it did in this case. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm
Some people said sadly as a joke that Justice Thomas had the courage of Justice Scalia's opinions. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:52 am
Judge Robert Bork compared it to an ink blot. [read post]
30 May 2020, 7:09 pm
In South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:48 am
Roberts. [read post]
25 May 2010, 12:23 pm
Spisak and Bobby v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 6:51 am
In UMG v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 8:11 am
Justice Thomas would be 91. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:35 am
Think, for example, of Jardines (Scalia and Thomas join three liberals to declare the dog sniff an illegal search), the Arizona vote case (Roberts and Kennedy join the liberals to declare that federal law preempts Arizona’s requirement that persons produce proof of citizenship to vote) or Alleyne v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 pm
Roberts explains that Secretary Duke was "bound by the Attorney General's legal determination" concerning Texas v. [read post]
