Search for: "People v Roby"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2012, 12:34 pm
Justice Robie begins this opinion with: "The facts of this case are horrendous. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 11:12 am
Justice Robie ends this opinion with:"The record before us indicates that this latest effort to commit defendant is the fourth time in as many years that the board has determined defendant is an MDO and the People have sought his commitment based on his 2003 robbery conviction. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 9:59 pm
And, again, I can see why the law might be as Justice Robie concludes it to be.Still. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:53 pm
Justice Robie begins this opinion by saying: "What people say behind your back is your standing in the community in which you live. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:19 pm
The Attorney General agrees, and confesses error.The Court of Appeal says: Wrong.Justice Robie says: "You guys forgot about the amendment. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
It simply seems like it's rebutted in situations in which, as here, everyone agrees that the impropriety resulted in (1) an acquittal on an offense that lots of jurors thought the guy was guilty of, and (2) a conviction in which all the jurors already thought the guy was guilty (and a portion of whom were merely hoping to convict on a greater offense).The case that Justice Robie cites for prejudice in this context is People v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 12:57 pm
Of which, sadly, there are quite a few.Justice Robie authors a very good opinion here. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 12:17 pm
Yours truly crossed there many a time.The downside of that practice was that inattentive people could be hit. [read post]
1 May 2024, 8:51 am
It brings to mind a phrase that people used to say when I was in college:"Don't steal. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:49 am
The cases and briefs curently available include: S149752: Roby v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:35 am
No summary judgment.A critical case for a huge number of people in Southern California. [read post]
28 May 2008, 10:50 am
I like what Justice Robie's done. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 3:33 am
Certainly that proposition is not supported by the only two cases the People cite. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:07 pm
All we want to let the jury know is that the defendant has previously been convicted and that our judgment is that people with those priors may tend to perjure themselves as well -- or that a jury could at least reasonably take that into account. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 2:02 pm
But Justice Robie says, accurately, that that's not the normal meaning of the term "delivered," which means actually delivered. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:20 pm
Not our job -- or role -- to do otherwise.Justice Robie writes a separate opinion. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 12:05 pm
That's the headline in today's MetNews about People v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 3:15 pm
"Sims' opinion came in the case of Barnett v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 9:10 pm
It's really, really hard to cross-examine a transcript, which is why those robed people in D.C. bothered to decide Crawford v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:55 am
Newtown Preservation Society, et al. v. [read post]
