Search for: "People v Rochester" Results 1 - 20 of 182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2006, 11:56 am
In People v Barton, 2006 NY Slip Op 09499, the New York Court of Appeals considered the issue of whether the provision of the City of Rochester's Municipal Code that prohibited aggressive panhandling... [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
The Gen V small block engine family will have unprecedented fuel efficiency and GMCH Rochester Operations will play a key role in helping us deliver this directly our customers. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 9:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Smith In the case People v Gonzales (68 NY2d 424 [1986], the court outlined the conditioned required for a missing witness charge and burden shifting analysis. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 8:02 am
In this digital era, however, more people are relying on electronic means to snag their spouses in compromising situations. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:04 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Consequently, we conclude that defendant did not voluntarily consent to the officers' entry into his home (see People v Richardson, 229 AD2d 316, appeal dismissed 89 NY2d 933; see generally People v Gonzalez, 39 NY2d 122, 128). [read post]