Search for: "People v Rufus"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2025, 8:55 am
This paper takes an in-depth look at the following topics: (i) the constitutional text and structure, (ii) ratification, (iii) the state elections of 1800 in Virginia and New York, (iv) Rufus King's advocacy in the Senate (1816-1824), and (v) the state elections in New York in 1823-24 (including Rufus King's role in those elections). [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 10:33 am
Lochner v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 7:28 am
The author of the maxim, Rufus Miles, thinks the idea goes all the way back to Plato. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:13 am
Loving v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:36 am
[Post by Venkat] Saffold v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 6:14 am
And in the 1868 election contest for Wayne County Sheriff, the Michigan Supreme Court, in People v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 10:39 pm
The Supreme Court's June 20 decision in Moore v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
The case concerns a conviction for denying the crime of genocide against the Armenian people. [read post]
6 May 2011, 8:09 am
Neff, United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 4:24 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: R (Evans) v HM Attorney-General, heard 24 and 25 November 2014 (UK Supreme Court) Rufus v Elliott, heard 10 December 2014 (McCombe and Sharp LJJ and Mitting J) OPO v MLA, heard 9 and 20 January 2015 (UK Supreme Court) Murray v Associated Newspapers, heard 21 January 2015 (Longmore, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd, heard 4… [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 5:45 am
U.S. v. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm
Michael Varey v People: The complaint was of harassment by a photographer commissioned via an agency. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:04 am
The cases brought by citizens against compulsory vaccination, and in particular, Jacobson v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 7:58 am
And, of course, the worst single feature of that Constitution is not even the Senate, but Article V, which, by basically making it impossible to amend the Constitution with regard to anything significant, creates an overwhelming incentive for smart people like Friedman to prattle on at his Georgetown and Silicon Valley and Davos dinner parties about the need for "better" and "more virtuous" people to take over our political system without ever, for even… [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: R (Evans) v HM Attorney-General, heard 24 and 25 November 2014 (UK Supreme Court) Rufus v Elliott, heard 10 December 2014 (McCombe and Sharp LJJ and Mitting J) Cruddas v Calvert, heard 9, 10 and 11 December 2014 (Jackson, Ryder and Christopher Clarke LJJ) OPO v MLA, heard 19 and 20 January 2015 (UK Supreme Court) Murray v Associated… [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
’ …” Lord Kerr SCJ referred to the rider that Sharp J had added to the second criteria in Elliott v Rufus [2015] EWCA Civ 121:- “…To this I would only add that the words ‘should not select one bad meaning where other non-defamatory meanings are available’ are apt to be misleading without fuller explanation. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: R (Evans) v HM Attorney-General, heard 24 and 25 November 2014 (UK Supreme Court) Rufus v Elliott, heard 10 December 2014 (McCombe and Sharp LJJ and Mitting J) OPO v MLA, heard 9 and 20 January 2015 (UK Supreme Court) Murray v Associated Newspapers, heard 21 January 2015 (Longmore, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Rai v Bholowasia heard 19-23, and 26 to… [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 12:26 pm
Rufus T. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:06 am
Bryant, although the internet citation of Ashmore v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 3:56 am
The 2020 Supreme Court case Bostock v. [read post]
