Search for: "People v Rumble (Barbara)"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:12 am
” Our PFF colleague Barbara Esbin carefully dissected this issue for the Commission in her recent filing in this proceeding. [read post]
