Search for: "People v Suarez"
Results 21 - 40
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2017, 9:36 am
Additional Resources: Man who fell off beach walkover goes to trial with Myrtle Beach, Dec. 8, 2016, Staff Report, MyrtleBeachOnline.com More Blog Entries: Suarez v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:36 am
Additional Resources: Man who fell off beach walkover goes to trial with Myrtle Beach, Dec. 8, 2016, Staff Report, MyrtleBeachOnline.com More Blog Entries: Suarez v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 6:46 am
Mengden IV PDF Note Yellowbear v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 6:10 am
The Court found that without question, the defendant's conduct rose to the level of depravity "manifested by brutal, heinous and despicable acts" (citing People v Suarez, 6 NY3d 202, at 214) necessary to establish culpability for second-degree murder. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
People are not stupid. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
People are not stupid. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 1:54 pm
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
Then the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
R. v Suarez-Noa, 2015 ONSC 3823 [8] In this case, the first four minutes of a 19 minute opening address had nothing to do with providing a general overview of the evidence. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:57 pm
v=3A1LvXRnpVg Hat tip to Luis Suarez who pointed out JP’s excellent TEDxAustin talk and also shared how he has made changes in his own life to avoid an unhealthy weight gain and information obesity (see the video below). [read post]
10 May 2012, 6:45 am
Suarez, 285 Ga. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm
To the extent that some courts have determined that section 260.10 (1) requires that a defendant's conduct must be directly focused upon the child, or that evidence of a child witnessing a severe act of violence is insufficient as a matter of law to support a conviction under this statute, those decisions are not to be followed (see, People v Carr, 208 AD2d 855, appeal after new trial 229 AD2d 446, lv denied 88 NY2d 1067; People v Suarez, 133 Misc 2d… [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 9:02 am
"]; see also Suarez v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 7:48 pm
” THE PEOPLE v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am
Binderup, 16-847, involves two people, Daniel Binderup and co-respondent Julio Suarez, who were separately convicted of strangely classified crimes: misdemeanors punishable by up to a two-year sentence in prison (sex with an underage person and drunken driving, respectively). [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 7:24 pm
The latter was the older rule in a case from the early 1980s, People v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
McAllen Hospitals, L.P. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:00 am
Political Backing v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 8:05 am
In response to the Fahrenthold tweet above.]Lucy Bernholz: Crusaders: The Philanthropic Funders That Helped Bring an End to Roe v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 8:24 pm
Additional Resources: The Other Holiday Shopping: Grocery Shopping, Dec. 1, 2014, USDA More Blog Entries: Suarez v. [read post]
