Search for: "People v Tomlinson"
Results 61 - 80
of 162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2012, 5:57 pm
Case Law: Thornton v Telegraph Media Group, an offer of amends defence fails – Hugh Tomlinson QC A load of hype? [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
The Court of Appeal yesterday handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
Ltd v Knight Steamship Co. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:25 pm
” He also referred to the Flood v Times case, on its way to the Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
Case Law: OPO v MLA, Shock and disbelief at the Court of Appeal – Dan Tench Case Law: ETK v News Group Newspapers “Privacy Injunctions and Children” – Edward Craven Case Preview: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Twitter libel trial about meaning and serious harm Defamation Act 2013: A Summary and Overview – Iain Wilson and Max Campbell Case Law: “Spiller v Joseph – the New Defence of Honest Comment” – Catherine… [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
On Wednesday 7 March 2012, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the Article 10 case of Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:43 pm
– Brian Cathcart Case Law: Gulati v MGN Ltd, A landmark decision on the quantum of privacy damages – Hugh Tomlinson QC and Sara Mansoori Case Law: “Spiller v Joseph – the New Defence of Honest Comment” – Catherine Rhind Case Law: Iqbal v Dean Manson, harassment by letter – Edward Craven Defamation Act 2013: The public interest defence and digital communications – Jacob Rowbottom Case Law: Růžový… [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 8:30 pm
In Sasqua Group, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:21 am
If Mike made indefensible accusations, he should retract them and accept the consequences, but if other people, such as potentially Ray Tomlinson, deserve credit for having invented email, then the truth should be told in the further proceedings. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am
Part 2 – Hugh Tomlinson QC Privacy: the way ahead? [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm
” Part 1 and Part 2 – Paul Bernal Is following people illegal? [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:45 am
“People do not respect this law. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
The normal order of things is of course for young people to claim to be older than they really are. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
The normal order of things is of course for young people to claim to be older than they really are. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 4:20 pm
This post was compiled by Georgia Tomlinson who is a researcher. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:50 pm
” The Greenslade blog has a post about an interview given by Inforrm contributor Hugh Tomlinson QC entitled “Tomlinson – why Hemming, tweeters and editors are wrong about privacy”. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm
The New South Wales government has called for national laws to allow people to sue for damages for serious invasions of privacy, as it pursues separate state-based reforms to criminalise revenge porn. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
It “would allow people to collect damages from someone who photographs them in an offensive way during their personal or family time“, reports AP (at Politico). [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
On 25 February 2017, the Novia Scotia Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal against the award of damages in the case of Marson v Nova Scotia, 2017 NSCA 17 Denmark A Danish appeals court has upheld a defamation ruling and a 10,000-krone fine given to the Danish People’s Party, a populist party which supports the centre-right government. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
Dr Damian Tambini discusses Hugh Tomlinson’s Inforrm post asking “Should journalists have privileges? [read post]
