Search for: "People v Vincent C."
Results 1 - 20
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2021, 12:00 am
Trade marksGuestKat Nedim Malovic considered the meaning of bad faith pursuant to Article 59(1)(b) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation, following the EU General Court's decision in Riviera-Airport v EUIPO.Also in the EU vein, InternKat Anastasiia Kyrylenko reported on the Opinion issued by Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe in Case C-123/20, which relates to the protectability of ‘partial designs’ as an unregistered Community design right.Asia… [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court explained in the 1852 case of Moore v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:31 am
you and those people you know in Kentucky? [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 3:35 am
People v Austin 2021 NY Slip Op 30276(U) January 29, 2021 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 451533/2019 Judge: O. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 8:12 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 7:03 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am
Louis University School of Law invited me to deliver the 2017 Vincent C. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am
This week evidence was given, by among others, New Zealand cricketers, Lou Vincent and Brendon McCullum. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:32 am
During the push for this legislation, the Chamber of Commerce acknowledged that “[c]lass action litigation is a necessary part of our legal system because it can bring efficiency and fairness to situations involving many people with similar claims. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:32 pm
Supreme Court Ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
Rybolovlev admitted that it’s hard for him to trust people, but once he does, he trusts them entirely. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:47 am
H: U.S. v Doe... [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:55 pm
Vincent and Canada. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm
Baker, C. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 12:28 am
.
People v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:25 am
State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Mabry, No. 06-2324, 06-2322 Defendants' convictions and sentences for conspiring to solicit and obtain prohibited payments from union contractors, and for soliciting and obtaining such payments, in violation of the Taft-Hartley Act, are affirmed over claims that: 1) the informal resolution of a payment dispute qualified as a "settlement" under 29 U.S.C. section 186(c)(2); 2) insufficient evidence presented at trial to support a finding that the exception to liability under… [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Vincent Bechtel 8. [read post]
