Search for: "People v Watford"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2015, 8:41 am
He rejected the petitioner's argument that exhaustion was futile in light of People v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:43 pm
” Watford noted that Screws was a key precedent for the Court in Monroe v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:27 pm
Not three.Ten different Ninth Circuit judges recuse themselves from the en banc call: Judges McKeown, Wardlaw, Bybee, Bea, Watford, Owens, Friedland, Miller, Collins, and Lee.So it's an opinion that may affect at least a nontrivial number of people in a particular socioeconomic group. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:06 pm
It's instead the fact that we use purported standing requirements to prevent people from challenging searches that directly target them. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
Thereby "distinguishing" the prior opinion written by Judge Watford. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 11:59 am
No probable cause, Judge Watford holds. [read post]
17 May 2021, 12:26 pm
Don't kill people. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 9:18 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 9:21 am
Hannum Conviction for Cyberstalking & Revenge Porn Survives First Amendment Challenge Contacting a Person’s Facebook Friends Isn’t Stalking–People v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 5:27 am
In Singh v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); another based on Cuyler v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 8:44 am
Under current judicial rulings regarding the federal court settlement in the Flores v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 10:37 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 4:26 pm
Plus Judge Watford, a relative newcomer. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 11:28 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 6:00 pm
See Carey v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:00 am
” SEC v. [read post]
