Search for: "People v Watford"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2024, 10:56 am
Let’s talk about Easha’s first case, Murray v. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 4:55 am
“What some people, I fear, do is jump to their preferred solution and hang on to that really, really tightly and say this cannot be the right answer unless you do a particular thing. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
Most French people seem to support the ban. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
See People v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 12:26 pm
Don't kill people. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
Thereby "distinguishing" the prior opinion written by Judge Watford. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:39 pm
People v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
In East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); another based on Cuyler v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:27 pm
Not three.Ten different Ninth Circuit judges recuse themselves from the en banc call: Judges McKeown, Wardlaw, Bybee, Bea, Watford, Owens, Friedland, Miller, Collins, and Lee.So it's an opinion that may affect at least a nontrivial number of people in a particular socioeconomic group. [read post]
9 May 2019, 8:44 am
Under current judicial rulings regarding the federal court settlement in the Flores v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 7:02 pm
Patel v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 5:27 am
In Singh v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 10:37 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 7:57 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
’” Section 9.61.260(1)(b) is unconstitutionally overbroad on its face, because it criminalizes much heated political and personal commentary of the sort that is routine when people discuss matters that outrage them. 1. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 9:18 am
United States v. [read post]
