Search for: "People v Wragg"
Results 1 - 20
of 87
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2018, 4:42 pm
This critique follows on from my previous post, in which I responded to Paul Wragg’s criticism of the manner in which the judge in Richard v BBC dealt with the first stage of the claim – whether Richard had a “reasonable expectation of privacy” in respect of the information broadcast about him. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
Wragg’s post is here. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 11:40 am
This point was clearly recognised in Campbell v MGN Ltd: as Lord Hoffmann said, it is about ‘the right to control dissemination of information about one’s private life and the right to the esteem and respect of other people’. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 4:06 pm
The long-awaited judgment in Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers Limited is the right decision. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:53 pm
In the first, Tower Hamlets v The Times, the newspaper was ‘ordered’ to publish a summary of the adjudication. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:35 pm
Riley v Murray, then, sits uncomfortably with the Court of Appeal’s decision in Miller v College of Policing [2021] EWCA Civ 1926, which was handed down on the same day. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
Dr Paul Wragg, Editor in Chief, Communications Law, Associate Professor of Law, University of Leeds, Associate Academic Fellow, Inner Temple [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 4:52 pm
There are three reasons why I think the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC is wrongly decided. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 5:09 pm
Dr Paul Wragg is a lecturer in law at the University of Leeds and an academic fellow of the Inner Temple. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 4:20 pm
These details could ONLY have been provided by people who know the claimant INTIMATELY. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 4:32 pm
Thin, nonsensical, and desperate, it makes the defence in The Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd seem meritorious by comparison, which, as readers of this blog will know, it was anything but. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 8:40 am
Rich people have money and seek to avoid tax. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 5:47 am
This includes Michael ‘people in this country have had enough of experts’ Gove, Amber ‘real people don’t care if the government reads their text messages’ Rudd, Boris ‘Sirte, Libya has a bright future as a luxury resort once their clear the dead bodies away’ Johnson, and failed politician but successful DJ, Nigel ‘we never said the NHS would get £350m a week after Brexit’ Farage. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 4:18 am
How many people are affected by SLAPPs? [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Remaining in the zone of patent law, PatLit carries a guest blog from the Wragge Lawrence Graham duo of Paul Inman and Andrew Maggs on inventive step and the role of the "obvious to try" test in Teva v Leo [Merpel posted on this very case yesterday, so now you have two commentaries to consider]. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm
Judgement was also handed down on meaning in Public Joint Stock Company Rosneft Oil Company v HarperCollins and Catherine Belthon [2021] EWHC 3141 (QB), the second libel claim to result from Putin’s People (above). [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 4:45 pm
Despite never having met her, people find her “awful, woke, weak, manipulative and spoilt. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am
” The latest Edelman Trust survey has revealed that two-thirds (67%) of people globally have said that they believe journalists purposely try to mislead people by saying things that are false or grossly exaggerated. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am
The list included former Daily Mirror editor Piers Morgan and former People editor Neil Wallis. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
Surveillance On 30 January 2023, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal found MI5 agents “unlawfully retained people’s intercepted data,” via the use of surveillance warrants from 2014-2019, Liberty and Privacy International v Security Service [2023] UKIPTrib1. [read post]
