Search for: "People v. Abdul"
Results 61 - 80
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2012, 4:18 pm
Jordan v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
It states: “Article 7. (1) All powers in the Republic belong to the people, and their exercise on behalf of the people shall be effected only under, and by the authority of, this Constitution(2) This Constitution is, as the solemn expression of the will of the people, the supreme law of the Republic, and if any other law is inconsistent with this Constitution that other law shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be void. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:09 pm
The People apologised at the High Court to Dale Farm resident and campaigner, Kathleen McCarthy, and agreed to pay her substantial libel damages. [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
The Kyiv Post was successful in a “libel tourism” case brought by businessman Dimitry Firtash in respect of a story downloaded by 21 people in England. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:13 pm
Citing to the Ninth Circuit's decision in Abdul-Jabbar v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:38 am
, in favor of Adnan Farhan Abdul Latif, largely because the judge found government intelligence reports to be unreliable. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 2:17 pm
So shut up, all of you.The United States Court of Appeals For the District of Columbia Circuit's opinion today in Abdul Latif v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 10:18 pm
Abdul-Latif (W.D. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm
Forasol v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:24 am
Munim Abdul & Ors v DPP [2011] EWHC 247 (Admin) – 16 Feb 2011. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm
In Munim Abdul and Others v Director of Public Prosecutions [2011] EWHC 247 (Admin) the High Court ruled that prosecution of a group of people who had shouted slogans, including, “burn in hell”, “baby killers” and “rapists” at a parade of British soldiers, was not a breach of their right to freedom of expression, protected by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
Munim Abdul and Others v Director of Public Prosecutions [2011] EWHC 247 (Admin) – Read judgment The High Court has ruled that prosecution of a group of people who had shouted slogans, including, “burn in hell”, “baby killers” and “rapists” at a parade of British soldiers, was not a breach of their right to freedom of expression, protected by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 3:40 am
In Kanika Mukherjee v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:55 am
Moreover, as I noted several years ago in an article on the landmark right of publicity case of Uhleander v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 6:59 am
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Forras v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:26 am
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:51 am
California, 386 U.S. 738 1967; People v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
Abdul Hakim-Shabazz has his own doubts about police on the Indiana Law Blog after the David Bisard case, where an intoxicated on-duty officer struck and killed a biker and somehow had the charges dropped. [read post]
