Search for: "People v. Acuff" Results 21 - 40 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2014, 10:52 am
The unpublished nature of the work undermines that in some measure (see, e.g., Harper & Row v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
  It seems that the complete duplication may be “excessive”, in light of the quantity, quality and importance of the material used (Blanch v Koons).Bruno is unimpressed with the dumb Starbucks crownhe has to wear to make his significant human happyIn relation to market effects, would the hundreds of people queuing up for Dumb Starbucks have alternately visited the original coffee retailer that day? [read post]
4 Jul 2006, 12:19 pm
The case is called Campbell, aka Skyywalker, et al. v Acuff Rose Music, Inc. 510 U.S. 569 (1994). [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Vaughn, 152 S.W.2d 631, 635 (Tenn. 1941)]; Acuff v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am by Eric
Acuff-Rose, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994), which held that an alleged rap parody of the popular song Pretty Woman could qualify as a parody protected by the copyright fair use doctrine. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
Two years after the Koons case, the Supreme Court recast fair use in Campbell v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:51 am
Weapon parody, however, is what most other people would call a satire. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 6:11 am
The Supreme Court treated the issue less than transparently in Campbell v. [read post]